1 + x = 2. Those who are gifted intellectuals can follow the reasoning of this math equation, and discover the mysterious variable. But what if I scribbled on the blackboard? Even the finest mathematician would be spoofed. You can’t solve what you can’t see.
In the human life debate (as I will call it, as pro-life/pro-choice are misleading) it comes down to one issue – are the unborn human beings? It’s simple. If they are, then killing them is morally wrong. You don’t get to kill someone just because they are an inconvenient result of a poor decision. Someone’s life trumps someone else’s nine-months of discomfort. This is common sense. Killing innocent people is wrong. If the unborn child is human, then it has rights which no government or group of people can grant or withhold. This is the only argument anyone should be having: human, or not.
But this is not a conversation abortion supporters want to participate in. . . because the issue is a lot more complicated. I’ve had debates with abortion supporters, and this is always their fall-back in one sense or the other, some will just say “it’s complicated,” while others will skirt around the issue and avoid all arguments they can’t refute by ringing off a list of irrational assumptions. Why? Because you can’t fight what you can’t see. And they know this. Their only way of winning is by distracting from the real issue – are the unborn human beings?
It gets weirder. Many abortion advocate’s will actually acknowledge the unborn to be human beings, “Yup, science proves it’s a human . . .but the mother didn’t ask for them, and the fetus can’t feel pain, and they can’t breathe, and how dare you force a woman to be pregnant, and it’s a women’s right, and the supreme court, and Hillary Clinton, and freedom, and Planned Parenthood, and bla bla . . . bla . . .bla.”
After making the statement that the unborn are human, the abortion supporter will immediately start clouding the statement with a lot of non-issues when compared with killing another human being (“It’s a human, but . . .”). Denying them their ability to live, love, and pursue happiness. I encourage you, research some abortion propaganda, you will see – people covering the truth, not with arguments, but with the only thing they have the power to do: confusion, and complicatedness.
It’s not complicated. People don’t get to kill other people unless those other people are seeking to kill more people. Babies don’t kill anyone; therefore, no killing babies.
This article doesn’t deal extensively with the issue of whether the unborn are human. For several reasons.
1) Many abortion supporters already know and acknowledge the unborn child to be a living human being. Some openly state this. Others deny it, but contradict themselves by slogans about making abortion “safe, legal, and rare.” Why make it rare if it is just a glob of intrauterine tissue? Because they know it’s a valuable human life.
2) But, there are groups of people who completely reject the idea that the unborn are human beings and that there is no reason not to dispose of worthless cells. I don’t spend a lot of time with these people. For the same reason that I don’t spend a lot of time explaining to people that the grass is green, or that the earth is round. You have the right to reject logic and reasoning, but don’t expect others to spend much time educating someone who openly rejects truth just because it doesn’t support their world view.
In conclusion, don’t allow abortion supporters to displace your position with distraction techniques. Force them to attack your argument. Research this, look at both sides, and develop an informed, unbiased, objective opinion on abortion. This article is not about starting yet another argument, or backslapping over trouncing abortion supporters. This article is about making a statement with no strings attached, no fog, no mistaking, and no confusion or complicatedness. . .
The United States has supported the killing of 50,000,000 children – this is unfathomably evil, and must end.